Altered automaticity (ectopic focus outpaces SA node) vs re-entry (unidirectional block + slow conduction → circulating impulse re-excites recovered tissue) — MOST clinically important tachyarrhythmias are re-entrant. Drugs break re-entry by: (1) slowing conduction further → unidirectional becomes bidirectional block, OR (2) prolonging refractoriness → circulating impulse meets still-refractory tissue and dies.
| Class | Mechanism | AP effect |
|---|---|---|
| I | Na⁺ blockade | ↓phase 0 upstroke, ↓conduction |
| II | β-blockade | ↓SA/AV conduction+automaticity |
| III | K⁺ blockade | ↑repolarization, ↑ERP |
| IV | Ca²⁺ blockade (L-type) | ↓SA/AV conduction (nodal=Ca²⁺-dependent upstroke) |
IA (quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide): intermediate kinetics → ↓conduction(↑QRS) AND ↑repolarization(↑QT) — dual action, torsades risk from QT component.
IB (lidocaine, mexiletine): FAST dissociation → minimal effect on normal-rate AP, preferentially blocks depolarized/ischaemic tissue (“use-dependence”) → ischaemic ventricular arrhythmias specifically. Slightly SHORTENS repolarization. Low proarrhythmic risk.
IC (flecainide, propafenone): SLOW dissociation → strongest conduction slowing (marked ↑QRS), minimal repolarization effect. CAST trial: suppressed PVCs post-MI but ↑MORTALITY — successful arrhythmia suppression ≠ survival benefit. Now restricted to pts WITHOUT structural heart disease.
↓sympathetic drive to SA/AV nodes+ectopic foci. Effective: sinus tachycardia, AF/AFl rate control, catecholamine-triggered VA. PROVEN mortality benefit post-MI — most other classes lack this (CAST lesson).
↑ERP without much ↓conduction (vs class I) — “cleaner” re-entry break, but QT-prolongation = core liability.
Amiodarone: has class I+II+III+IV actions SIMULTANEOUSLY despite III categorization. Long t½(weeks)→oral LOADING dose used. Toxicity: pulmonary fibrosis · corneal microdeposits(reversible) · thyroid dysfunction BOTH directions(iodine-rich, resembles T4 — hypo from iodine load, hyper from thyroiditis-like effect) · hepatotoxicity · blue-grey skin · photosensitivity. LOW torsades risk despite ↑QT — its Ca²⁺-blocking(IV) action protects against early afterdepolarizations — key exception to “QT-prolongers cause torsades.”
Sotalol: III + non-selective β-blocker(II). Effective but DOSE-DEPENDENT torsades risk (lacks amiodarone’s protective Ca²⁺-block) — careful QT monitoring at initiation.
Ibutilide, dofetilide: pure K⁺ blockers, acute pharmacological cardioversion of AF/AFl. Significant torsades risk → inpatient ECG-monitored initiation.
Verapamil/diltiazem: ↓SA/AV conduction (nodal Ca²⁺-dependent upstroke, unlike Na⁺-dependent atrial/ventricular muscle). AVNRT + AF/AFl rate control. NEVER + β-blocker (heart block) · avoid in HF (negative inotropy) — same rules as Antianginals/Antihypertensives.
Adenosine: A1 receptor→↑K⁺ conductance→hyperpolarize AV node→transient profound AV block. DOC for AVNRT termination. Ultra-short t½ (seconds, RBC/endothelial uptake) = deliberate feature. SE: transient flushing/chest discomfort/“impending doom,” self-limited.
Digoxin: AV ERP↑ (vagal+direct) → AF/AFl rate control, esp. if HF coexists (full detail: Drugs for Heart Failure).
MgSO4: specific for torsades de pointes (any cause) + digoxin-toxic ventricular arrhythmias.
CAST trial = organizing lesson, not just an IC footnote: abolishing an arrhythmia on the monitor ≠ improving survival, since most classes achieve antiarrhythmic effect via mechanisms (↓conduction, altered refractoriness) that are THEMSELVES proarrhythmic, especially in structurally diseased hearts. Class II (β-blockers) = standing exception with real mortality benefit — why it stays first-line despite being the “weakest” antiarrhythmic on paper.
A cardiac arrhythmia arises from either an abnormality of impulse generation (altered automaticity — an ectopic focus fires faster than the SA node, or the SA node itself is suppressed/escapes are needed) or an abnormality of impulse conduction (most importantly re-entry — a self-sustaining circuit forms when a region of unidirectionally blocked, slowly-conducting tissue allows an impulse to travel around a loop and re-excite tissue that has already recovered from its refractory period). Most clinically important tachyarrhythmias are re-entrant; most antiarrhythmic drug mechanisms are best understood as ways of breaking a re-entrant circuit — either by slowing conduction further (converting unidirectional to bidirectional block, extinguishing the circuit) or by prolonging refractoriness (so the circulating impulse arrives at tissue still refractory and dies out).
The standard framework groups antiarrhythmics by their dominant ion-channel/receptor action, even though several agents have actions spanning more than one class:
| Class | Mechanism | Key effect on the action potential |
|---|---|---|
| I | Na⁺ channel blockade | Slows phase 0 upstroke, slows conduction |
| II | β-adrenergic blockade | Slows SA/AV nodal conduction, reduces sympathetic-driven automaticity |
| III | K⁺ channel blockade | Prolongs repolarization, prolongs the effective refractory period (ERP) |
| IV | Ca²⁺ channel blockade (L-type) | Slows SA/AV nodal conduction (nodal tissue is Ca²⁺-dependent, not Na⁺-dependent, for its upstroke) |
Class I is itself subdivided by how quickly the drug dissociates from the Na⁺ channel (a fast-dissociating drug barely slows normal-rate conduction; a slow-dissociating one does so markedly) — this “kinetics of association/dissociation” idea, not the raw potency of channel block, is what actually separates the subclasses and explains their differing ECG/clinical effects:
Reduce sympathetic drive to the SA and AV nodes, slow nodal conduction, and reduce automaticity in ectopic foci that depend on catecholamine stimulation — genuinely effective for sinus tachycardia, rate control in AF/AFl, and suppressing catecholamine-triggered ventricular arrhythmia (exercise-induced, post-MI). Also carry a proven mortality benefit post-MI, a property most other antiarrhythmic classes conspicuously lack (see the CAST-trial lesson above).
Prolong the action potential and the ERP without slowing conduction velocity much (in contrast to class I) — in principle a “cleaner” way to break re-entry, though the QT-prolongation this requires is itself the class’s core liability.
Verapamil and diltiazem slow conduction through the SA and AV nodes (nodal tissue’s action potential upstroke is Ca²⁺-dependent, unlike atrial/ventricular muscle’s Na⁺-dependent upstroke, which is why class IV agents act selectively on nodal tissue rather than on the whole heart). Effective for AV-nodal re-entrant tachycardia and ventricular rate control in AF/AFl. Never combine with a β-blocker (additive AV nodal depression → heart block) and avoid in heart failure (negative inotropy) — both restrictions echo the identical cautions already established for these same drugs in Antianginal Drugs and Antihypertensives.
The CAST trial is the organizing lesson for this entire topic, not just a footnote on class IC: an antiarrhythmic that successfully abolishes an arrhythmia on the monitor is not automatically a drug that helps the patient survive longer, because most Vaughan-Williams classes achieve their antiarrhythmic effect by mechanisms (slowed conduction, altered refractoriness) that are themselves capable of creating new, sometimes fatal, arrhythmias (proarrhythmia) — especially in structurally diseased hearts. Class II (β-blockers) is the standing exception with genuine mortality benefit, which is precisely why it remains first-line for so many indications despite being, in a narrow sense, the “weakest” antiarrhythmic on the list.
What to draw: A loop of cardiac tissue with a region of unidirectional block (impulse cannot pass forward through it but can eventually pass backward once the rest of the loop has repolarized), showing an impulse travelling around the loop, re-exciting tissue that has already recovered, and perpetuating itself.
Labelling requirements: explicitly mark the unidirectionally blocked segment and the direction of circulating conduction — a re-entry diagram that doesn’t show why the block is one-directional (an area of slowed conduction/prolonged refractoriness relative to its neighbours) reduces the concept to “the impulse goes in a circle,” which misses the actual mechanism drugs are designed to interrupt.
Common exam-marking mistakes:
Not rendered as a diagram — this is a classification of four drug classes by mechanism, which the table in notes.md already communicates directly (class, ion channel, effect on the action potential) without needing a flowchart to restate the same four rows.
Common exam-marking mistakes:
Personal revision notes, mnemonics and reminders.
