HD = arises in lymph nodes, extranodal secondary. ~8% of lymphoid neoplasms. Bimodal peaks (15-35yr, >5th decade), more in young males. Diagnostic: Reed-Sternberg (RS) cell.
Rye classification (4 subtypes): lymphocyte-predominance, nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte-depletion. WHO regroups into: nodular lymphocyte-predominant HD (new entity) + classic HD (all 4 Rye types).
The real neoplastic cell but scarce (<5% of tumour mass) — rest is reactive infiltrate. Monoclonal B-cell (germinal centre) origin. Classic HD: CD15+, CD30+. Lymphocyte-predominance type: CD15-, CD30-, CD20+.
Variants: Classic (bilobed mirror-image nucleus, owl-eye nucleolus) — mixed cellularity. Lacunar (pericellular halo) — nodular sclerosis. Popcorn/L&H (lobulated) — lymphocyte-predominance. Pleomorphic — lymphocyte-depletion.
| Subtype | % | RS cells | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphocyte-predominance | 5% | Few, classic+polyploid | Excellent |
| Nodular sclerosis | 70% | Frequent, lacunar | Very good |
| Mixed cellularity | 22% | Numerous, classic | Good |
| Lymphocyte-depletion | 1% | Numerous, pleomorphic | Poor |
| Nodular lymphocyte-predominant HD | 2% | Sparse | Chronic relapsing, may → large B-cell NHL |
Nodular sclerosis: collagen bands + lacunar RS cells, more in women, commonest overall.
Painless firm movable lymphadenopathy (cervical, mediastinal commonest). Splenomegaly ~half. B symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss) in 25-40%.
Normocytic normochromic anaemia. ↓Serum iron+TIBC but normal/↑marrow iron. Leukaemoid reaction, eosinophilia (if pruritus), lymphopenia (advanced). Platelets normal/↑. ESR always ↑. ↓T-cell immunity, reversed CD4:CD8.
I: single node region. II: ≥2 regions, same side diaphragm. III: both sides diaphragm. IV: disseminated extralymphatic. Suffix A (no symptoms)/B (constitutional symptoms), E (extranodal), S (spleen).
Stage I/IIA ~100% 5yr survival; advanced ~50%. Order: lymphocyte-predominance > nodular sclerosis > mixed cellularity > lymphocyte-depletion (worst).
HD: mostly B-cell, localised spread, extranodal/marrow rare, constitutional symptoms common, aneuploidy, never spills to blood, better prognosis (75-85% cure). NHL: 90% B/10% T, disseminated spread, extranodal/marrow common, translocations, may spill to blood, worse prognosis (30-40% cure).
RS cell being <5% of tumour mass while defining the diagnosis is unusual among malignancies — most of what’s seen microscopically is the body’s reaction, not the tumour. RS variant correlating with subtype (and matching immunophenotype) is a reliable pattern. HD’s orderly, contiguous nodal spread (vs NHL’s unpredictable dissemination) is why localised radiotherapy and staging laparotomy mattered more historically for HD.
Hodgkin lymphoma (Hodgkin’s disease, HD) primarily arises within lymph nodes, involving extranodal sites only secondarily — about 8% of all lymphoid neoplasms. Incidence shows bimodal peaks: young adults (15–35 years) and again after the 5th decade; overall more prevalent in young adult males. The classical diagnostic feature is the Reed-Sternberg (RS) cell (also called the Dorothy-Reed-Sternberg cell).
Diagnosis requires biopsy, usually of lymph node. Unlike NHL, HD has only one universally accepted classification — the Rye classification (since 1966), with 4 subtypes:
The WHO classification regroups these into two main categories:
RS cells are the actual neoplastic cells, but are surprisingly scarce (under 5% of the cellular population) — the bulk of the tumour mass is a reactive infiltrate. This is why identification requires a thorough search, and why architectural/cellular context matters as much as finding an individual cell (similar-appearing cells can occur in infectious mononucleosis and some other lymphomas). Immunophenotyping shows RS cells are of monoclonal B-cell (germinal centre) origin in most subtypes; in classic HD they are CD15+, CD30+, while in lymphocyte-predominance type they are CD15−, CD30−, CD20+.
Morphologic variants (each characterising a different subtype):
| Variant | Features | Subtype association |
|---|---|---|
| Classic RS cell | Large, bilobed mirror-image nucleus, prominent eosinophilic inclusion-like nucleolus with clear halo (“owl-eye”), abundant amphophilic cytoplasm | Mixed cellularity (frequent) |
| Lacunar type | Smaller, pericellular lacuna (artefactual cytoplasmic shrinkage) | Nodular sclerosis (characteristic) |
| Polyploid/popcorn (L&H) | Larger, lobulated “popcorn”-shaped nucleus | Lymphocyte-predominance |
| Pleomorphic | Pleomorphic, atypical nuclei | Lymphocyte-depletion |
The number of RS cells is generally inversely proportional to the number of reactive lymphocytes in a given subtype.
| Subtype | Incidence | Main pathology | RS cells | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphocyte-predominance | 5% | Proliferating lymphocytes, few histiocytes | Few, classic + polyploid; CD15−, CD30−, CD20+ | Excellent |
| Nodular sclerosis | 70% | Lymphoid nodules, collagen bands | Frequent, lacunar type; CD15+, CD30+ | Very good |
| Mixed cellularity | 22% | Mixed infiltrate (lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, plasma cells) | Numerous, classic type; CD15+, CD30+ | Good |
| Lymphocyte-depletion | 1% | Scanty lymphocytes, atypical histiocytes, fibrosis | Numerous, pleomorphic; CD15+, CD30+ | Poor |
| Nodular lymphocyte-predominant HD | 2% | Small lymphocyte proliferation, nodular pattern | Sparse; CD45+, EMA+, CD15−, CD30− | Chronic relapsing, may transform to large B-cell NHL |
Nodular sclerosis — most frequent overall, more common in women; defined by two essential features: bands of collagen (occasionally replacing the entire node with dense hyalinised collagen) and lacunar-type RS cells.
Mixed cellularity — heterogeneous infiltrate replacing the entire node, with frequent typical RS cells, some fibrosis, focal necrosis.
Lymphocyte-depletion — two variants: diffuse fibrotic (hypocellular, homogeneous hyaline fibrosis) and reticular (more cellular, numerous atypical pleomorphic histiocytes, scanty lymphocytes).
Gross appearance of HD and NHL is largely indistinguishable — cervical, supraclavicular, and axillary nodes most commonly affected; initially discrete nodes, later matted masses; cut surface grey-white, “fishflesh”-like.
| Stage | Extent |
|---|---|
| I | Single lymph node region (or single extranodal site, IE) |
| II | Two or more node regions, same side of diaphragm (or with localised contiguous extranodal involvement, IIE) |
| III | Node regions on both sides of diaphragm (± extranodal, IIIE; ± spleen, IIIS; ± both, IIIES) |
| IV | Multiple/disseminated extra-lymphatic involvement, with or without lymphatic involvement |
Suffixes: A (asymptomatic) or B (constitutional symptoms — fever, night sweats, unexplained weight loss >10%); E (extranodal); S (splenomegaly).
Overall 5-year survival for stage I/IIA approaches 100%; advanced-stage disease up to 50%. Prognosis follows subtype: lymphocyte-predominance (excellent, usually localised) > nodular sclerosis (very good, though large mediastinal mass responds poorly) > mixed cellularity (intermediate) > lymphocyte-depletion (poor, usually disseminated at diagnosis, most aggressive).
| Feature | Hodgkin | Non-Hodgkin |
|---|---|---|
| Cell derivation | B-cell mostly | 90% B, 10% T |
| Nodal involvement | Localised, spreads to contiguous nodes | Disseminated nodal spread |
| Extranodal spread | Uncommon | Common |
| Bone marrow involvement | Uncommon | Common |
| Constitutional symptoms | Common | Uncommon |
| Chromosomal defects | Aneuploidy | Translocations, deletions |
| Spill-over to blood | Never | May occur |
| Prognosis | Better (75–85% cure) | Worse (30–40% cure) |
Hodgkin lymphoma is fundamentally a classification topic (Rye/WHO subtypes, RS cell variants, Ann Arbor staging) rather than a multi-step disease mechanism — the tables in notes.md already carry the structure that matters, and a rendered diagram would just be a redrawing of a table.
Draw a single table by hand with four columns (Subtype / RS cell variant / Key histology / Prognosis) and fill in the four Rye subtypes plus nodular lymphocyte-predominant HD — this is the single most testable structure in the topic and benefits more from active recall of the table than from a process diagram.
Personal revision notes, mnemonics and reminders.
